Posts Tagged thoughts

Date: June 20th, 2010
Cate: matt's life, things to think about
1 msg

updated infrequently.

Okay, six months since the last entry? How’d that happen? Do I really have nothing new to say?

I mean, what’s it take to make me write an update – a good book? (The Perks Of Being A Wallflower, in this case)

For about a year, I kept a fairly frequent journal in highschool. And most of the things I complained about seem petty now. I’m pretty sure they weren’t petty back then, but the Matt in 2010 thinks the Matt in 2003 had it better than he thought. Not that things are bad now, or anything.

The point of these has always been thinking aloud, and posterity, maybe, and a little bit of showing off even. I mean, I like my life, I like me, and I flatter myself by wondering whether what I’m feeling and thinking might be intriguing, interesting, even entertaining to everyone else. To be honest, it’s a little censored, but maybe I’ll get over that eventually – or maybe there are some things that you have to censor, in order to get along with everyone. Even if it’s a little vain to think that everyone reads the mortality blog.

I was thinking that if you were to plot my life on a line graph, where Y is time, X is frequency, and each line represents any particular activity, you’d see two shapes appear most often: A quick peak and a long gradual dropoff, and a fairly steady line, or maybe something close to a low-amplitude sine-wave. In other words, some things I don’t do, and I don’t do, and suddenly I do all the time, and then I do less, and I do less, and I barely do at all. Things like parties, drinking, drugs, sex, making music, maybe even jobs – I’m not sure what those things have in common, but they’ve never been constant, always a peak and a decline. Then maybe another peak. The other things happen fairly regularly: reading, writing, listening to music, playing video and computer games, that sort of thing. Again, not sure what they have in common – maybe I should actually make that graph and look for a pattern. But those things tend to always happen, and keep happening, with little dips or spikes in frequency but overall very steady occurrence.

Which makes me think about the future, a little. For instance, let’s say how much I weigh, and any hypothetical plans I make to ‘get in shape’ – would regular exercise be a peak and a decline, or a new constant line? If I get a gym membership tomorrow, will I go less and less until I find myself paying a monthly fee for something I don’t use, and putting on the weight I’d previously lost? Or more to the point, beyond idle speculation, if I had reason to believe that was the case, would it be reason not to try?

But that’s just an example. I can live (well, for a while at least) with being about 50 pounds heavier than I remember feeling in highschool. I’m thinking about work, though. That’s the main thing that concerns me at the moment. Actually, I’m trying not to let it concern me, but I’m wondering about it.

In highschool, and in lots of other areas in my life, I have this sort of weird thing I do, which might be procrastination, but almost borders on… I don’t know, some sort of distraction, or something. Where something is important, and I know it’s important, but for some reason it becomes more and more important that it not be so important. That sentence makes sense, but I’m not sure it’s easy to follow. Let’s try an example. I work on a project, and there isn’t anything particularly special about that project, but this thing happens – and it starts out being important (because it’s fun, and I like the people I’m working for, and I’m getting paid on top of it all) but gradually, it becomes more important not to care. Maybe my sleep schedule is unrelated, which’d be easier, for sure, but maybe not. Either way, when I wake up at 9 in the morning after only getting 4 or 5 hours of sleep, it becomes harder and harder to just get up and do work. It gets harder to look at code instead of youtube vidoes – and youtube videos are completely unrelated, it could be anything, singing songs I like out loud, or tracing patterns in carpet, or literally anything I know isn’t at all important instead of doing something that I know is actually important. I know it, and yet…

… so that’s weird. At first I kind of wondered if this was a new thing, due to whatever, finishing puberty and hormones, or a change of scenery as I ‘grew up’ in a more cultural sense, but I’m betting it’s actually always been there, but it never mattered before. Because it was only school, or they were only friends, or it was only piano lessons, or it was only church, even only college. But when there’s rent, utilities, and “the lifestyle to which I’ve become accustomed,” it’s hard to say “it’s just work.” Already I’m wondering if I’m over-analyzing this, and just feeling a little melancholy and loquacious because I just finished a good book. But it’s happened, this thing, it’s happened at work, and so it isn’t not a problem (which isn’t an unintentional double-negative.)

Now, I’ve only recently started to notice it… to really recognize it. I suspect that CMD might have been the first casualty, and I’m thinking Ascentium might be the second. Although if I’m really rolling with this, AIPD might be before that, and even my grades in highschool, and maybe even a few things I can’t mention specifically here because of the people involved. My point being, I might’ve screwed a few things up in the past, which makes me wonder how I’m going to do in the future.

Arguably, I could just make the line on that chart I mentioned earlier marked ‘job’ turn into a constant line over a long period of time – my lifetime. If I keep getting jobs, then losing them, then hanging out for a bit before getting another, and then losing it, it’ll make a nifty little sawtooth wave that’ll average out to a straight line. But as long as I’m waxing metaphorical, a sawtooth at a short frequency sounds sweet on a synthesizer (thin and bitey) the whole quick cycle of jumping in and out of work doesn’t really sound right for me in the long run. It’s hard to be secure, although I’m awfully lucky to have found a career that pays so much that I can afford to be lazy about addressing things like this. See, I’m bragging.

So that’s what I wonder. What happens in the future? Do I try working out a bit, doing some running or some lifting, eat a bit less, and burn off some fat? Or do I fall off of that and go back to 230lbs? Do I continue to get peak and decline jobs until I’m… 60, or whenever I end up retiring, if ever?

The silly thing is, I kind of don’t care. If you ask me whether I’m an optimist or a pessimist I’d have to say the former, although only because I feel like overall things have generally worked out well for me, and so far I have no reason to believe that’ll change any time soon. I can’t tell if I deserve it or not, because then we’re talking about free will and determinism and I like the idea that there is no free will though it’s a moot point because we will never become powerful enough to map all the variables and accurately predict the ramifications of any particular action in such a complex system as human life, let alone the string of choices and related activities that put people like me in the place where I find myself. That’s a lot of writing I just did there. Anyway.

I guess I’m thinking that it’ll turn out alright, however it turns out, I don’t feel like I’m wasting my life by any means (not that it’ll be any less easy to die as a result.) But now that I’ve got this theory, I’ve got this observation about that thing that I’ve been doing, it makes me want to play with it, to see if I can figure out when it happens, and what to do about it. I guess it’s kind of a revelation, maybe not an epiphany (or maybe, if it illuminates other things about myself, who knows) and I’m happy with it, especially now that I’ve thought it out enough to actually articulate it a little, even in writing on my little blog that no one reads, ha ha. And if I manage to figure it out, I feel like I’ll have a responsibility (not to anyone but myself, arguably the only responsibility that’s important) to follow through and try to do something with it – get rid of it, work around it, overcome it. Because I’m embarrassed, I’m unsatisfied, I feel like my mostly smart self is being held back by this craziness.

So we’ll see about that. Maybe I’ll keep a little spreadsheet, or a new notebook journal thing, or whatever. I do think (as I usually think when I write a new entry for stuff like this) that I’ll start keeping a journal again, a personal one where I can make a post-college rendition of my highschool self’s petty complaints about stuff that doesn’t matter – I mean, it’s cathartic, maybe not even at the time, but certainly in retrospect, reading back in the future. That was Matt in 2003, or maybe even 1998. What was that kid thinking? So this’ll be me in 2010 – can you believe that stuff he thought was important?

If only I could see what it is that I’m stuck on now that I’ve circumnavigated then. Being a time traveler sucks when you’re stuck going one second per second, eh?

Date: June 4th, 2008
Cate: things to think about

The wisdom of strong opinions, weakly held [myspace]

So I was reading one of my favorite blogs, Coding Horror:

I suppose it’s also an issue of personal style. To me, writing without a strong voice, writing filled with second guessing and disclaimers, is tedious and difficult to slog through. I go out of my way to write in a strong voice because it’s more effective. But whenever I post in a strong voice, it is also an implied invitation to a discussion, a discussion where I often change my opinion and invariably learn a great deal about the topic at hand. I believe in the principle of strong opinions, weakly held.

A couple years ago, I was talking the Institute’s Bob Johansen about wisdom, and he explained that — to deal with an uncertain future and still move forward – they advise people to have “strong opinions, which are weakly held.” They’ve been giving this advice for years, and I understand that it was first developed by Institute Director Paul Saffo. Bob explained that weak opinions are problematic because people aren’t inspired to develop the best arguments possible for them, or to put forth the energy required to test them. Bob explained that it was just as important, however, to not be too attached to what you believe because, otherwise, it undermines your ability to “see” and “hear” evidence that clashes with your opinions. This is what psychologists sometimes call the problem of “confirmation bias.”

- Strong Opinions, Weakly Held [codinghorror.com]

- Strong Opinions, Weakly Held [http://bobsutton.typepad.com]

Wow, nested quotes. Anyway, That made perfect sense to me. I try to assume I’m right about everything – if I didn’t, I don’t think I would have the confidence to make tough decisions. Of course, that sort of thinking could lead to some really bad decisions, so I always make sure that I reach an opinion through serious consideration – awareness of the facts, and not only my own conclusions about it, but people I respect as well. And even once I’ve formed an opinion, it’s not imutable – in fact, I love it when people can convince me that I’m wrong, because it makes me that much better off in the long run.

Yeah. Strong opinions, weakly held. Dig it.

Date: June 4th, 2008
Cate: matt's life

why I do the things I do [myspace]

Motivation for action is an interesting thing. There are plenty of different motivators – I’ve always thought that the survival instict is the base of everything else. Some of us are lucky enough not to need to worry about basic survival needs – food and shelter, then reproduction and community. The possibility that I might not be able to eat tomorrow, or I might not have a safe place to sleep tonight has never crossed my mind. It’s not even on my radar. So when survival isn’t really much of a factor, why do I want to do all this other stuff?

I’ve got urges that I don’t really have a name for – but there are some words that come close:

  • aesthetic
  • whimsy
  • sentiment
  • feng-shui
  • atmosphere

… irony in particular appeals to me in a tought-to-describe manner.

Here’s why I’m thinking about all this. I reorganized my clothes today, and now I’ve got one drawer for socks – and what goes in a sock drawer? Well, socks, sure, but also porn! And I realized I didn’t have any actual physical porn.

Now, I like porn, I’ve got tons of it, but the digital format works great for me – in fact, I really don’t even think that porn magazines and DVDs are even neccesary any more. And yet – as soon as it occured to me, I really wanted to get an actual porno magazine for my sock drawer.

So it’s the irony of me having porn in my sock drawer, right where it’s supposed to go, that prompted that. The sort of aesthetic picture of me moving my socks aside and finding those glossy pages underneath. I don’t know, it’s weird, but it’s appealing.

Then there was the dilemna of what magazine to get – I gave the  Taboo on 82nd’s selection a once over, and picked out one published by ‘Bel Ami’. It was a tough choice – ‘Penthouse’ or even a not-so-racey ‘Victoria’s Secret’ would have actually fit in better, that or ‘Playboy’, but in the end it seemed like fitting the stereotype by putting a porn magazine in my sock drawer but then breaking it by making it gay porn was so much better.

So with that as an example, there’s actually a lot of that kind of reasoning that dictates my actions. Obviously, it’s not always practical. But in most cases, my choice in most things is guided by comfort, utility, and irony, possibly in that order.

… this whole thing might’ve actually just been an effort to make a post more interesting then, “I got porn for my sock drawer!”, ha ha. Well. That’s all I’ve got on this subject.

edit: oh man, this just occured to me, I rack up further irony points due to the fact that you don’t just put porn in your sock drawer, you hide it there – which means I’m telling people that I’m hiding it, therefore making it not at all hidden! Ohhhh man this is so perfect.

Date: June 4th, 2008
Cate: things to think about

is the controlled substances act a popularity contest? [myspace]

So, I was kind of thinking about writing a quick letter to my state rep, Earl Blumenauer. From what I’ve read, he’s a pretty cool guy. But I’m not sure I really want to write him a letter. Maybe I will. I’ll try it out as a blog post first, anyway.

Salvia divinorum is a plant that contains a chemical called ‘Salvinorin A‘, which is a hallucinogen. It’s normally available in concentrations (5x, 10x, 20x, etc), and most often smoked (preferably at a higher temperature then normal lighters). It’s also legal in the state of Oregon. Sounds kind of weird, huh? Kind of inconsistent? Or even hypocritical? The thing is, if we choose, Oregon could keep it legal. And who gets to decide stuff like that? Our buddy Earl.

Hello there Earl -

I wanted to send you a quick note concerning the legality of ‘Salvia divinorum’, to see what your thoughts were on the subject, and on a broader scale, recreational drug use.

Do you think that that mind-altering substances can be used in a way that isn’t ‘abuse’? I suppose that’s the wrong question to ask, because there’s always the potential for them to be used responsibly (for entertainment, relaxation, or even spiritual exploration) but the issue to consider is whether citizens in general can be trusted to do so.

Legal alcohol consumption versus illegal use of marijuana is probably the most accessible example of this question. Although both are drugs with similar levels of effect on the people that use them, the former is legal, while the latter is not. There are plenty of mitigating factors for this disparity (economic and even religious) but demonization of marijuana in the media significantly influenced public opinion. Salvia is starting to experience some of the same negative attention – lately there have been headlines and news reports which are nowhere near neutral-sounding:

“Deadly Dangers Of A Street Legal High”
“Now, an exclusive I-Team investigation of a hallucinogenic drug that has begun to sweep the nation. What might amaze you is that right now the federal government is doing nothing to stop it”

(from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvia_divinorum)

The implication of the second quote is obvious – that hallucinogenic drugs are bad, and the federal government has a responsibility to protect people from them. What are your thoughts? Are such substances inherently dangerous? I would argue that Salvia, like most things, exhibits potential for abuse, but is not inherently dangerous. Poor judgment and character flaws might prompt a user to put themselves in a dangerous or harmful situation, but the drug itself is inconsequential – a slew of other things, legal and illegal, from firearms to fireworks, could just as easily become dangerous if used incorrectly or in a reckless manner. Should all citizens suffer because not everyone is as capable of exercising good judgment? I would advocate greater attention on education and utilization of existing rules (disturbing the peace, drunk and disorderly, driving under the influence, et cetera) to encourage people to make good choices and only punish those who fail to do so, rather then using blanket restrictions to control the minority of people who ‘ruin it for the rest of us’.

I’m not sure how much this issue (legality of Salvia divinorum in particular, but recreational use of mind-altering substances as well) is on your radar, but I thought it couldn’t hurt for me to voice an opinion. I’ll understand if you don’t want to get in to a protracted email discussion about it, but if you feel like conversing on the subject, I would love to talk.

sincerely,
Matt Lohkamp

On a related note, consider this Latin proverb – abusus non tollit usum, or “abuse is not an argument against use.” What do you think?

edit: on a related note: legal status of Salvia in Oregon [wikipedia]
‘nother edit: “firearms to fireworks” is a pretty good phrase, if I do say so myself. Gotta love those alliterations.